- Home
- Men's Clothing
- Men’s Pants and Denim
- Men's Snowboard Pants
- 686 Reserved Raw Pant - Men's - 2011
686 Reserved Raw Pant - Men's - 2011
2011 Model No Longer Available
Image
Detail Views
Be the first to upload your photo of the Reserved Raw Pant - Men's. >
686 Reserved Raw Pant - Men's - 2011
686 include a Matix-approved waistband shoelace drawstring feature with the Reserved Raw Pant to give you the custom fit that you want, but never thought possible. The Raw features 10K waterproofing and casual 5-pocket jeans styling to give you that sought-after I-meant-to-do-that look.
- Critical seams taped for added waterproofing in common trouble areas
- AIR-FLO leg vents keep the air circulating to cool you down when you need it
- Curved back hem openings with Cordura cuff guards save your pant legs from getting shredded
- Gusseted crotch panel for added durability
- Articulated knees for a natural fit
- Size-adjustable waist tabs for a fine-tuned fit
- Lower leg stash pocket conceals the goods
- Pant-to-jacket connection points for use with certain 686 jackets
Bottom Line: Visual justification.
Leave your mark on The Wall.
I'm 5'11", 145 -- the black wax would go great with
I'm 5'11", 145 -- the black wax would go great with my setup. However, I'm not a fan of my pants dragging at the heels (hanging TO the heels is fine) but I don't want to go M for shorter length if I'm going to be squeezed into these like Betty Davis, and have them unbutton every time I move.
I purchased a pair of Burton pants in L before for this reason, and they ended up looking like I raided MC Hammer's winter closet.
How do these pants hang? How adjustable/forgivable are they at the waist? Which will be better, M or L?
By: Jason Kerouac
January 20, 2012
i want to get a pair of these but i'm debating between the
i want to get a pair of these but i'm debating between the medium and the large. i'm 6'0" and i usually wear pants that are right around 33-34" in the waist...any suggestions? i don't want them too baggy but obviously i want to have enough movement to ride comfortably in them
By: patburrellsucks2340414
December 25, 2011
you could go either medium or large. Medium will fit you true to size and will fit your waist better. Large for extra bagginess.
By: Shredwise
December 27, 2011
nut 4 deze pants
By:
mat4996799
December 11, 2011
i really love these pants! they arent to tight but at the same time not too baggy. they are just overall quality pants. i def reccomend these
i'm 6'3", 175, usually wear a 32W 34L pant. My
i'm 6'3", 175, usually wear a 32W 34L pant. My biggest concern is length on these, should I go M or L?
By: Sean O
December 4, 2011
large
By: mat4996799
December 11, 2011
They are neither they arent like a slim tight pants just more fitted so yeah a little slimmer but not like hugging your legs
By: Sam
December 1, 2011
More on the slim side
By: tum3983581
December 1, 2011
Change me.
Tech Specs:
- Material:
- [membrane/laminate] Infidry-10; [shell] poly twill denim, (black premium wax denim) [shell] 98% cotton, 2% poly-blend premium wax denim; [lining] nylon taffeta, poly peached and brushed tricot, poly mesh
- Fabric Waterproof Rating:
- 10,000 mm
- Fabric Breathability Rating:
- 8000 g/m�
- Insulation:
- none
- Fit:
- tailored
- Venting:
- inner thigh mesh vents
- Side Zips:
- yes, ankle
- Gaiters:
- yes, bootlace hook
- Seams:
- critical seams taped
- Waist:
- belt loops, shoe lace belt
- Pockets:
- 2 front hand, 2 back, 1 thigh, 1 lower leg stash, 1 hidden credit card
- RECCO:
- no
- Recommended Use:
- snowboarding
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 1 year
1 Comment Last Comment: December 29, 2011 by: Sam
By: Sam
December 29, 2011
how skinny are these? i tried l1 skinny denim pants and those are to skinny for me. would i like these or are they just as skinny or baggier?
Flag
Comment on mat4996799's review >