686 Smarty Original Cargo 3-In-1 Pant - Men's - 2011
2011 Model No Longer Available
Research other out-of-stock versions:
- 686 Smarty Original Cargo Tall Pant - Men's - 2012 >
- 686 Smarty Original Cargo Pant - Men's - 2012 >
- 686 Smarty Original Cargo Pant - Men's - 2010 >
- 686 Smarty Original Cargo Tall 3-In-1 Pant - Men's - 2011 >
- 686 Smarty Original Cargo Tall Pant - Men's - 2010 >
- 686 Smarty Original Cargo Pant - Men's - 2009 >
- 686 Smarty Original Cargo Pant - Men's - 2008 >
- 686 Smarty Original Cargo Pant - Men's - 2005 >
Be the first to upload your photo of the Smarty Original Cargo 3-In-1 Pant - Men's. >
Leave your mark on The Wall.
September 5, 2011
I bought a pair of these 3 seasons ago. I love these pants, they have an inner liner which keeps you really warm. Any 686 jacket is compatible with these pants. The material has held up great, I put my pants through hell the last 3 seasons. The only place where there has been significant wear is at the bottom of the pants by my heels where they rub on my highbacks. Overall these pants were a great buy...Plus they have tons of pockets for whatever you might want to stash while you're on the mountain.
March 25, 2013
These are well designed pants, comes with a fleece inside-liner that zips and unzips off with ease. Without the liner the pants are much lighter. Comes with plenty of useful pockets using velcro, zipper, or buttons. The only minor issue is that the button at the bottom of each pant leg unsnaps fairly easy, making the pants look a little "bell-bottom-ish," but otherwise, Excellent pants; keeps my arse warm and dry for sure.
Dogfunk.com Price Comparison
Dogfunk.com knows that no one wants the used-car-salesman experience, so we decided to show you the other guys prices in an effort to keep your shopping experience as informed as possible. We do our best to confirm this information is correct, but assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
def large long. I am similar in size and the medium fits but arent as comfy to ride in. im 6' 2" and i have the longs you will def want the longer version
April 27, 2012
go with the large. it will be the best fit.
By: Tim Bohlken
April 11, 2012
im 5 10 175 pounds , 34 inch waist... large or medium??? , are they really baggy??
March 1, 2012
or 4got to ask are the long leg ? or std?
March 1, 2012
December 25, 2011
My chick got these for me for xmas and the pants are dope!!! crazy pockets and every pocket has a purpose. I have not hit the hill with them yet but can tell they are going to be warm with the liner. supper cozy. i am 6-2 and 195 i wear a 33 waist and did try on the med but they were too short. my girl ordered the large from dogfunk and the fit was awesome! not to baggy not to tight. love them cant wait to shred the hill!!
trust them it is in there.
By: Tim Bohlken
February 15, 2012
I am 6'2" 195 with a 34" waist. I got the large and they are perfect.
By: Brian Allen
January 17, 2012
Love the pants but the XL is for like a size 42 waist
December 18, 2011
im 5'11 and pretty lean and i wear the large. theyre baggy but not overly. id probably roll with the XL.
By: Patrick Walsh
September 2, 2011
Depending on your waist size, my first suggestion would be large for 34 inch waist or XL for 36 inch waist.
August 29, 2011
- [membrane/laminate] Infidry-15; [shell] nylon oxford; [lining] nylon taffeta, poly peached and brushed tricot, poly mesh; [removable liner] poly brushed tricot microfleece
- Fabric Waterproof Rating:
- 15,000 mm
- Fabric Breathability Rating:
- 10,000 g/m≤
- inner thigh mesh vents
- Side Zips:
- yes, ankle
- yes, bootlace hook
- fully taped
- adjustable tabs
- 2 front handwarmer, 1 lower leg stash, 1 right front belt loop stash, 1 hidden credit card/ID
- Recommended Use:
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 1 year