- Home
- Snowboard
- Boards
- Wide Snowboards
- Burton Blunt Snowboard - Wide - 09/10 - 2009
Burton Blunt Snowboard - Wide - 09/10 - 2009
2009 Model No Longer Available
Burton Blunt Snowboard - Wide >
Research other out-of-stock versions:
Image
Be the first to upload your photo of the Blunt Snowboard - Wide - 09/10. >
Burton Blunt Snowboard - Wide - 09/10 - 2009
Spark up the Burton Blunt Wide Snowboard and take your riding to the next level. Burton gave this twin-tip deck the V-Rocker and Cruise Control Technology to give you a soft and buttery trick-landing combo for the park, while the triple-rocker design and Pressure Distribution edges gives you tons of control, more pop than an AR-15, and make it practically impossible to catch an edge.
- Fly Core with Negative Profile offers thinner sections of core between the bindings for a softer flex and torsion
- Biax React fiberglass features a jib-friendly low torsional flex and a forgiving feel
- Slantwalls absorb impacts and add durability
- Pressure Distribution Edges extend out slightly beneath the bindings for crazy edge hold
- V-Rocker negative camber gives you tons of pop, stability and catch-free fun
- Twin Cruise Control Technology combines a softer flex and mellower edge-tune for a catch-free and fun ride
Bottom Line: Elevate.
Leave your mark on The Wall.
should i go with this board or the k2 www? im confusedddd
should i go with this board or the k2 www? im confusedddd
By: andrew
August 26, 2010
very flexible and has good pop....and its super cheap
By: VacaSean
September 3, 2011
k2 for riding the parks
By: Brady
February 1, 2011
They are pretty similar boards. The Blunt originated as an affordable soft park board while the WWW was developed for street riding. Both boards have now gone towards a more mixed riding style. I still think of the WWW as a more jib friendly board with it's flat base center opposed to the Burtons v-shaped one.
All in all I think you can safely pick the board that appeals the most to you in both design and brand. I personally would go for K2, they give great value and have never let me down.
By: Sebastian Hansen
August 28, 2010
Really good
By:
Connor Kerkezian
March 27, 2010
really good, I hardly ever catch an edge with it and it has a reall loose soft feel.
should i go with this board or the k2 www? im confusedddd
should i go with this board or the k2 www? im confusedddd
By: andrew
August 26, 2010
this one is amazingly fun... haven't spent too much time on a www.
By: Four Horsemen
August 27, 2010
sweetness
By:
jar2991854
December 13, 2009
this board is pretty freakin awsome major steeze if your looking for a good board get this
Hey will my Ride LX bindings fit on this board? I have a crap
Hey will my Ride LX bindings fit on this board? I have a crap board called the morrow radium and its so stiff that you cant even press it after a full year season. Is the Blunt gonna hold up on 30+ foot jumps? I wanted to get an artifact but I'm not going to ride a pink board.
By: Scott Koenigbauer
August 24, 2010
I'm about to order that, dude I'm so happy. and I bet i can get at least $50 for that Morrow at a ski swap. I know that it's gonna have pop because my friend cleared a whole 25foot box with one. too bad we tried to film it and he clipped his nose and broke his collarbone.
By: Scott Koenigbauer
August 24, 2010
What Ryan said is true. They will fit now problem. This board is pretty fun. You will be stoked.
By: Wooden Robots
August 24, 2010
YES! Your Ride LX binding will come with a disk that will work on the board.
The blunt will hold up no problem on 30+ foot jumps. You'll be stoked movin' on from that Morrow.
By: Four Horsemen
August 24, 2010
Hey Scott, the Blunt is definitely a more "progressive" snowboard. You can probably bomb a 30ft kicker but 40ft and above; I would not attempt unless you're a sick rider. I won't feed you a bunch of b.s. but I don't really know if your Ride's will fit on this board. I did a demo on a Blunt a while back....it was a great board for the money and I could ollie all day with her. Very snappy, not super light-weight, but seriously, for the money, it's a great board. Hope this helps bro! Board safe.
By: Christopher Shephard
August 24, 2010
Sweet ride
By:
specialblender
November 17, 2009
I've had this board for about two weeks now and so far it's been riding amazing both in the park and off. The v rocker makes it great for spinning on rails and boxes and with the cruise control you barely ever catch edge. the only down that i've had so far is that the bottom scratches really easy other than that its all around a great board and completely worth the money
what is more important. a very good board with a regular bindings?
what is more important. a very good board with a regular bindings? or a regular board withe a very good bindings?
By: arturo
March 1, 2010
Go with Bindings, you can make the board work, but if your bindings hurt your feet your day is done. Your feet have to be comfortable. Boots are the most important, then bindings then board.
By: Wooden Robots
March 1, 2010
you need a good board, bindings can be a pain in the a__ when they break or because they are heavy or not comfortable but a junk board will hold you back and not allow you to progress.
By: EastCoastRider
March 1, 2010
Write your question here...I have size 14 feet and im looking
Write your question here...I have size 14 feet and im looking at this board and im not sure what sizes i need so i need hlp!!
By: rylan
December 28, 2009
thnx im 140 pounds and im just not sure if i need big waist width or anyof that ? so maybe a 156cm?
By: rylan
December 29, 2009
most important thing is not foot size but your weight. If you're over 180 lbs you'll *need* a 159cm board at least, if you're over 200 lbs you'll need bigger than that.
By: David Zemens
December 28, 2009
How do I know if I need a wide snowboard or not?
How do I know if I need a wide snowboard or not?
By: Fred Macey
December 22, 2009
its usually a good idea to ride a wide when your boots are size 12 and up
By: EastCoastRider
December 22, 2009
Change me.
Tech Specs:
- Lengths:
- 153cm, 156cm, 159cm
- Shape:
- Twin
- Effective edge:
- [156cm] 1205mm
- Waist width:
- [156cm] 258mm
- Sidecut radius:
- [156cm] 7.5m
- Stance width:
- [156cm] 56cm
- Stance setback:
- Centered
- Core material:
- Fly (wood)
- Base:
- Lightspeed Vision
- Rider Weight:
- [153cm] 115-165lb (55-77kg); [156cm] 130-180lb (59-82kg); [159cm] 135-185lb (61-84kg)
- Recommended Use:
- Jibbing, terrain parks, city rails
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 1 Year
1 Comment Last Comment: June 9, 2010 by: Stefan
By: Stefan
June 9, 2010
I'm 5'10, 150lbs, used the 153 wide last year and loved the v-rocker compared to my older blunt versions. All around good board, hit up every area of the mountain and it did well.
Flag
Comment on Connor Kerkezian's review >