Im 5'10, 175lbs with a 32 inch waist and...
Im 5'10, 175lbs with a 32 inch waist and looking for some baggier pants, would the large be too big?
Get the mediums my man. I am 6' and the large are way too baggy on me. If you want the crazy baggy steez then you can get the large but i think the mediums are a good fit with enough bagginess.
It all boils down to personal style and usage. Like Lyman says; the L are baggy. But then again I'm 5'11", 32/34 waist, 168lbs and I have the Annex in XL. It's baggy but not like a tent.
If you're not used to baggy stuff the L could be a nice starting place, if you're used to baggy stuff and have some XL coats go for the XL.
Remember: A large coat with smaller pants looks OK. A small coat with large pants looks weird.
And while were at it, If you plan to do a lot of trekking with this pant the L is probably better, the XL is a bit hassle when walking a lot.
I agree with Lyman. I'm 6 feet tall with 32" waist, and really like my baggy pants. Had these in Large last season, they were gigantic. I looked like a raver, for real. Go for the mediums.