Gear Review
Not really a baggy fit
By law3453644
Ranked #1159 - Men's Pants
February 11, 2011
I don't know why the call the fit "baggy", I had to return the XL I bought because the legs were too tight. I'm 6' 220 lb and when I tried them on I couldn't even get into a crouched stance like riding without them stretching to the limit around the crotch/thigh area. I don't even want to imagine what would happen if I took a decent spill wearing these. I've worn XL on every other pair of boarding pants and these were the only ones that didn't fit. (I ****'d it because the pants look good and feel like they'd be really functional, I just don't like the fit)
View Details: Nomis SC Simon Chamberlain Snowboard Pant - Men's
Helpful Votes: 1 Yes
Tech Specs:
- Fabric Waterproof Rating:
- 15,000 mm
- Fabric Breathability Rating:
- 15,000 g/m²
- Insulation:
- none
- Venting:
- inner thigh vents
- Gaiters:
- yes
- Seams:
- critical seams taped
- Waist:
- belt loops with button closure, removable suspenders
- Pockets:
- 2 hand, 1 pass, 2 back
- Recommended Use:
- snowboarding
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 30 days
Change me.




1 Comments Last Reply: February 11, 2011 By: jus3984369
I completely agree with this. Although they fit, they are tight around the upper thighs and even through the butt. If they didn't add that stupid sagging thing on the butt, they would be perfectly fine. I'm going to keep mine, but just be aware of the lack-of-bagginess when buying them. If i bought them any larger than a medium at being 5'8" and 170lbs, I would have been swimming in extra fabric.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes