- Home
- Snowboard
- Boards
- Powder Snowboards
- Lib Technologies 1986 Snow Mullet BTX Snowboard - 2009
Lib Technologies 1986 Snow Mullet BTX Snowboard - 2009
2009 Model No Longer Available
View 16 Other Powder Snowboards >
Research other out-of-stock versions:
Image
Lib Technologies 1986 Snow Mullet BTX Snowboard - 2009
Roll out of bed, race up the canyon with your Lib Tech 1986 Snow Mullet BTX snowboard, and pop around on your banana’s Morning Wood before all the powder’s gone. Magne-Traction edges magically transform the misery of riding crud to sheer joy as the Banana Tech rocker in between your boots takes you the rest of the way to pleasure town. Whether you ride Lib Tech’s tribute to a mythical hairstyle in the deeps where it shines like Soul Glo, or find yourself on a groomer heading back to the lift, the Mullet has the party favors you need to get there in style.
- Magne-Traction edges turn ice into powder
- Banana Technology rocker between the bindings for a controlled, surfy ride
- Morning Wood core is stiff and packs serious pop
- TNT Base rides super fast and doesn’t need a lot of maintenance
Bottom Line: This party is all business—just like a bulletproof tiger.
Leave your mark on The Wall.
I can't decide between the 165 or 172. I'm 6' 3"
I can't decide between the 165 or 172. I'm 6' 3" and weigh 230 so that leans me towards the 172 but I live on the east coast so most of the free ride stuff I do is pretty tight and a shorter board would be appreciated. Does anyone have any advice?
By: dcg3366321
August 18, 2010
Yeah bro, I am 6', 230 and I ride DC PBJ 160 for freestyle and all mountain. I also ride a 157 on park days. I'd stick to a 165 for the East Coast scene. I rode Wisp and Snowshoe out there and I had a 160 Lib-Tech Youth in Asia. It was a great board for those mountains. Hope this helps, board safe brother!
By: Christopher Shephard
August 21, 2010
Hilltopper
By:
nat3854066
June 10, 2010
When i was searching dogfunk. for a board to replace my Nitro Pantera the Mullet looked like all i wanted in the one board and i wasn't let down.
A powder shape that rode well in all conditions. This board comes into its own on chopped powder and rode as smooth and silk in the fresh.
The wide nose grabbed a little on the steep groomers but that only provoked aggressive riding and made me enjoy a beer at the end of the day even more.
I/m 6'1", 205 lbs and I ride a Rome Anthem 162 which
I/m 6'1", 205 lbs and I ride a Rome Anthem 162 which I love as an all around board, but I feel like I need a pow board. I've been told that with the BTX you can stay at your normal board size and still float nicely but I'm wondering if I should man up to the 172 or just stick with a 165. Or is this even the board I want for pow specific riding?
By: Mike Van Meter
January 22, 2010
I am guessing the 165 is going to be the one. I am 6', 175 and I ALMOST got the 165 but went 160 instead. It still floats well and the BTX is absolutely killer. The Mullet is a surprisingly good all-purpose board without too much setback, I have moved my stance all the way back for the powder we just got, it's fantastic.
The Mullet is a great board, you won't be disappointed.
By: JMH
January 23, 2010
I ride the 165 and absolutely love it! My friend went up to the 172 and loves it. He weighs about the same as you do. Either way you go, you're going to be happy. The 172 obviously floats slightly better and is slightly faster. Really though, I'm happy with the manueverability of my 165. This is the BEST board I've ever ridden, hands down. LOVE IT!!!!
By: Spacey
January 26, 2010
Change me.
Tech Specs:
- Lengths:
- 156cm, 160cm, 165cm, 172cm
- Shape:
- Directional
- Effective Edge:
- [165cm] 1250mm
- Waist Width:
- [165cm] 261mm
- Sidecut Radius:
- [165cm] 8.15-8.65m
- Stance Width:
- [165cm] 43-60cm (17-23.5in)
- Stance Setback:
- 1.5cm
- Core Material:
- Morning wood
- Base:
- TNT
- Rider Weight:
- [156cm] over 90lb; [160cm] over 100lb; [165cm] over 110lb; [172cm] over 120lb
- Recommended Use:
- Freeride, big mountain, powder
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 1 Year
Comment on nat3854066's review >