- Home
- Snowboard
- Boards
- All Mountain Snowboards
- Lib Technologies T.Rice Pro Model C2 BTX Points Snowboard - 2011
Lib Technologies T.Rice Pro Model C2 BTX Points Snowboard - 2011
2011 Model No Longer Available
Image
Be the first to upload your photo of the T.Rice Pro Model C2 BTX Points Snowboard. >
Lib Technologies T.Rice Pro Model C2 BTX Points Snowboard - 2011
It is awe-inspiring how Travis Rice ever-so-delicately dissects the fear-inducing terrain of Jackson, New Zealand, Alaska, and other unheard of high-altitudes on the Lib Technologies T.Rice Pro Model C2 BTX Points Snowboard. It's like it's not enough to just ride deep powder, he has to throw some switch double-combo loopty-woo into it.
- C2 BTX places camber underfoot and rocker in between the bindings for a forgiving ride, while Magne-Traction edges maintains a grip on hardpack and ice
- Environmentally friendly bio-plastic top sheet is made from renewable castor beans … mmmm, castor beans
- Axis-Inversion fiberglass flips the script on what you knew about fiberglass and delivers insane pop
- Correct sandwich construction shaves weight off the nose and tail to spin faster
- Power Transfer Internal Sidewalls give you an extra dose of pop from the inside out
- Sintered UHMW base is fast and durable
- Artwork by Mike Parillo; treat your eyeballs at mikeparillo.com
Bottom Line: One word: Travis Rice kills it! Oh, wait, that's four.
Leave your mark on The Wall.
im a little stumped about what size to get. i will be in utah
im a little stumped about what size to get. i will be in utah next year and was looking at this board for pow. im 5'11 170lbs and not sure which to get the 161.5 or the 164.5. your feedback is appreciated.
-trav
By: tpa4543707
March 29, 2012
Either size will be great for Utah. The 161.5 is plenty of board to have great float on even the deepest days out here and probably a little more versatile for when there isn't fresh snow. It will also be a little more maneuverable and playful, but if you want even better float the 164.5 will be very fun as well. I personally would get the 161.5.
By: Brandon Collett
March 31, 2012
Yes
By:
David Power
January 20, 2012
This board is amazing. Good pop, great edge hold, digging the c2btx. Got the 161.5 pointy, wanted to go long for pow, but still use it for all mountain. Never questioned its ability on groomers and jumps, but I've just now been able to test the float the last couple days with these Colorado storms, and so far it's killed it. Quite a bit heavier than I expected, but that really hasn't bothered me at all.
I want to buy the 2011 t.rice c2btx lib tech with horsepower.
I want to buy the 2011 t.rice c2btx lib tech with horsepower. I love the graphic and the 2012s graphic is sub par. If anyone knows of a good site to purchase this let me know. I've been hounding Google.
By: heath
March 13, 2012
check out the lib tech site now, board are 20% off on the HP... good luck!
By: tpa4543707
March 29, 2012
So far, Love it
By:
Fio5332795
February 2, 2012
I have only gotten to use it twice so far, but the T.Rice board has been great. It's really aggressive and has great pop and edge hold. I haven't gotten a chance to try it in the powder yet, but up in New England it has performed great in the less than desirable conditions. I also think the graphics look awesome.
I have demo'ed the T.Rice C2 BTX 2012, but am thinking about
I have demo'ed the T.Rice C2 BTX 2012, but am thinking about getting the 2011. Is there any significant differences between the two, or am I going to get the same ride?
By: Jason
January 2, 2012
My buddy has the 2011 161.5 while I have the 2012 161.5 and honestly I haven't noticed any differences at all. Geometry is the same, weight is the same, flex, etc. No reason not to get the 2011 to save some cash or preferred art. I'll update if I notice anything.
By: David Power
January 20, 2012
What's the difference between this board and the HP vers
What's the difference between this board and the HP version?
By: wen4431455
December 10, 2011
The materials used are completly different. The graphics are slightly different too, being more colurful and sparkly on the HP version.
This board has Lib's H-Pop core, HP version has 100% Columbian Gold core. This board uses fiberglass, the HP version uses 100% basalt fibers.
The shape is the biggest similarity.
By: Dan Scherman
December 27, 2011
If I wear a size 12 and im 175 is this board too narrow?
If I wear a size 12 and im 175 is this board too narrow?
By: Blake
November 27, 2011
No way. the Travis Rice has a 26cm waist width, which is considered wide.
By: Dan Scherman
November 29, 2011
Change me.
Tech Specs:
- Length:
- 161.5 cm, 164.5 cm
- Shape:
- twin
- Flex:
- medium-stiff (7 of 10 on Lib Tech's scale)
- Camber:
- hybrid (C2 Power Banana)
- Sidewalls:
- double sintered UHMW
- Effective Edge:
- [161.5 cm ] 1245 mm; [164.5 cm ] 1270 mm
- Waist Width:
- [161.5 cm ] 260 mm; [164.5 cm ] 262 mm
- Sidecut Radius:
- [161.5 cm ] 8.4 m; [164.5 cm ] 8.5 m
- Stance Width:
- 20.25 - 26 in
- Stance Setback:
- centered
- Core:
- H-Pop (wood alloy)
- Base:
- sintered UHMW
- Recommended Rider Weight:
- [161.5 cm] 130 + lb; [164.5 cm] 140 + lb
- Recommended Use:
- freeride, all-mountain, big mountain freeride
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 1 year
Comment on David Power's review >