- Home
- Snowboard
- Boards
- Freestyle Snowboards
- Rome Postermania Snowboard
Rome Postermania Snowboard
The Rome Postermania Snowboard hooks-up high end tech without the premium price tag. A snappy yet playful flex, twin Freepop Rocker profile, and QuickRip sidecut give the Postermania a go-anywhere freestyle ride for well-rounded shredders looking to expand their bag of tricks both in and out of the park.
- FreePop Rocker profile is mostly flat with a rockered tip and tail for an all-mountain freestyle ride that's poppy, floaty, and forgiving
- StraightBiax Carbon laminate for a mellow, surfy flex with plenty of longitudinal snap
- Durable, tip-to-tail wood Pop Core Matrix with Carbon V Stringer technology for extra ollie/nollie power
- QuickRip sidecut uses 2 radii with an extra contact point in-between, for a short and jibby feel at low speed, and a more stable and grippy feel at high speed
- True twin shape for a consistent feel both regular and switch
- SinterTrue base for plenty of speed and crystal-clear base graphics
Bottom Line: Get more huck for your buck.
Leave your mark on The Wall.
Change me.
Research out-of-stock versions:
Tech Specs:
- Length:
- 144 cm, 147 cm, 150 cm, 153 cm, 156 cm, 159 cm
- Shape:
- true twin
- Flex:
- medium
- Camber:
- rocker (nose and tail)
- Effective Edge:
- [144cm] 1090 mm; [147cm] 1120 mm; [150cm] 1150 mm; [153cm] 1180 mm; [156cm] 1210 mm; [159cm] 1240 mm
- Waist Width:
- [144cm] 246 mm; [147cm] 248 mm; [150cm] 249 mm; [153cm] 251 mm; [156cm] 253 mm; [159cm] 254 mm
- Sidecut Radius:
- [144cm] 7.32 m; [147cm] 7.54 m; [150cm] 7.77 m; [153cm] 7.99 m; [156cm] 8.22 m; [159cm] 8.44 m
- Stance Width:
- [144cm] 21 in; [147cm] 21.5 in; [150cm] 22 in; [153-159cm] 23.5 in
- Stance Setback:
- centered
- Core:
- Pop Core Matrix
- Base:
- sintered
- Recommended Rider Weight:
- [144cm] 75 - 125 lb; [147cm] 85 - 140 lb; [150cm] 110 - 165 lb; [153cm] 115 - 170 lb; [156cm] 130 - 195 lb; [159cm] 150 - 220 lb
- Recommended Use:
- freestyle, park, street
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 2 years





Comment on Hreiðar Kristinn's review >